Let Them Speak
HB 344 in Massachusetts is an encouraging and hopeful bill that would make illegal the cruel practice of devocalization in canines. The following is from Animal Law Coalition:
Debarking robs dogs of one of their main methods of communication. Dogs vocalize to communicate countless feelings—fear, frustration, danger, pain, boredom, and even joy and happiness. Dogs in severely crowded puppy mills and laboratories and dogs who are neglected and left alone in backyards for hours on end are the most common victims of debarking. Just as with any unwanted behavior—canine or otherwise—addressing the reasons that cause barking that is perceived to be excessive is the only humane and civilized way of addressing the behavior.
“If it becomes law, a bill sponsored by Representative Lida E. Harkins, titled “An Act Prohibiting Devocalization of Dogs and Cats,”, HB 344, will make it illegal in the state of Massachusetts to perform devocalization procedures for reasons of convenience and ignorance. As you may know, debarking, or devocalization, is an invasive surgical procedure that involves removing a large amount of laryngeal tissue to try to make dogs mute. It involves a great deal of post-operative pain. Because this procedure is inherently cruel and unnecessary, many veterinarians condemn it and refuse to perform it.
Debarking robs dogs of one of their main methods of communication. Dogs vocalize to communicate countless feelings—fear, frustration, danger, pain, boredom, and even joy and happiness. Dogs in severely crowded puppy mills and laboratories and dogs who are neglected and left alone in backyards for hours on end are the most common victims of debarking. Just as with any unwanted behavior—canine or otherwise—addressing the reasons that cause barking that is perceived to be excessive is the only humane and civilized way of addressing the behavior.
“What is devocalizing or silencing?
Devocalizing or silencing is a painful surgical procedure to remove or cut the vocal chords. This procedure can cause paralysis of the larynx, difficulty in breathing, and adverse reaction to anesthesia. An animal may be forced to undergo multiple surgeries because of regrowth of tissue.
The proposed legislation would make it illegal for anyone to surgically devocalize a dog or cat. There are exceptions to protect the health of the animal. Only in rare instances would surgical devocalizing or silencing be medically necessary.
More typically, surgical devocalizing is a cruel, inhumane act done for the convenience of the owner. It does not address the problem causing the barking such as stress, fear, loneliness, frustration, illness, injury, poor socialization, lack of training, and instead is akin to cutting the vocal chords of a noisy child.
Dogs and cats that cannot vocalize their intentions, moods or needs present a risk to the public and increased liability to pet owners. People may not realize a dog is about to bite or attack, for example, because the dog has not barked, and because he has been debarked, can only make a wheezy, rasping sound. A dog that cannot bark also cannot signal danger to family members, for example, from an intruder or a fire.
Also, devocalizing or silencing enables illegal activities associated with dogs and cats: Owners trying to avoid pet limits, licensing or nuisance laws may simply debark their pets. Worse, commercial breeders hiding the numbers of dogs or cats they have and the squalid conditions in which they are kept, notoriously rely on surgical devocalizing. Surgical devocalizing allows hoarders to go undetected for too long. Dog fighters also use surgical debarking to avoid detection of their criminal activities.
Making surgical devocalizing or silencing a crime will, in fact, give law enforcement and prosecutors another tool in investigating and prosecuting dog fighting and animal cruelty as well as enforcing regulations for commercial breeders
Your Voice Is Needed!
Please politely urge your state representative to support “An Act Prohibiting Devocalization of Dogs and Cats”, HB 344, to protect animals in Massachusetts from this frivolous, cruel mutilation. You can contact all the representatives using the following information:
You can find your rep and senator here:
http://wheredoivotema.com
Look for rep and senator in general court
Massachusetts House of Representatives
24 Beacon St. #145
Boston, MA 02133
617-722-2000″
I was surprised to find the AVMA takes a different position, quite a cowardly and deceptive one, given their reasoning. “And the bill ‘infringes upon a veterinarian’s exercise of her or his professional judgment.’”
Fuck you, American Veterinary Medical Association. You state, The MVMA “deplores devocalizing an animal to facilitate the animal’s sale or for reasons of convenience, and encourages responsible pet ownership from the start, including selecting a breed and particular dog appropriate for the owner’s living situation and foreseeable family circumstances,”
yet you know full well that owners will continue to abuse this procedure in exactly the way you’re describing. Furthermore, you’ll be profiting from it. A coincidence?
This is a vicious practice, a senseless one in which convenience trumps compassion and humanity. It assists morons who have no business owning pets in the first place make cruel decisions based on their own convenience, and it assists criminals and sociopaths who profit from inhumane breeding practices and dog fighting. Many breeders admit they routinely do this, and you know it. Your reasons for opposing this legislation are laughable, thin, and transparent. You’re behaving like any other power structure, like the mainstream medical system you’re modeled after. Like any government, force or political body you oppose any measure that would limit your own authority and power. That’s why it frightens you.
I had a professor in an education program who told us he visited the last school in the United States to use corporal punishment on children. The school was in Texas. He was a sociologist, and interviewed many of the teachers associated with it. To a person, they all said they didn’t think physically striking kids was right, but didn’t want to lose the ability to do so. This is an aspect of human nature, and it is obviously the case with you as well. Unfortunately, with the imprimatur of your false authority which is in fact your cowardice, willful ignorance and arrogance masquerading as medical opinion, you may well influence the outcome of this proposal. Fuck you. Cowards like you always lose in the end.
To my readers, please oppose this senseless practice, wherever you live. Thank you.
http://www.hsvma.org/advocacy/news/hsvma_backs_bill_to_ban_devocalization_in_massachusetts.html









12. October, 2009 at 00:59
[…] Let Them Speak « Imagine […]
12. October, 2009 at 01:06
[…] original post here: Let Them Speak Bookmark It Hide Sites […]
12. October, 2009 at 11:56
The AVMA just like to sit on the fence and swing their legs, they won’t come down against the cruelty of debarking dogs or declawing cats because their members make a hell of a profit out of mutilating animals for money. In my opinion while it’s legal to mutilate cats and dogs there are always going to be people willing to pay for it. Vets do not educate and counsel against it so the only way to stop it is BAN it, ban debarking ban declawing!
http://www.petitionthem.com/default.asp?sect=detail&pet=4312
12. October, 2009 at 13:25
Well said, Barbara. Great post. Thank you.
12. October, 2009 at 17:51
[…] Let Them Speak « Imagine […]
13. October, 2009 at 05:36
I am sorry but I can’t believe humans feel they know what a animal needs or that they even need altered to our liking. Humans are phuckin idiots in my book when it comes to domestic animals. But it’s okay to leave a mans genitals attached after molesting children or raping woman. It is okay to allow these mothers to keep having children when the courts know they have mental issues instead of taking action and fixing these woman so they can no longer have children. We can’t even make a stand against our own kind, but lets butcher these animals and change their appearance. A bunch of phucken idiots allowing decisions to be made to benefit themselves. I say leave the animals alone. If you can’t accept your pet of choice for what it is, don’t get a damn pet. It’s that simple. If laziness is a part of your living, don’t get a pet, get a friggen fish. But make sure to not have your Vet remove it’s bowls so it does not get the fish water dirty. Clean the damn fish tank.
You guys are even useless to talk to. You don’t care about Gods creatures and you will do and keep doing what you feel is fit for the animal. Plain and simple. We need to turn you all in for cruelty to animals. You are no different then the punks that go around neighborhoods and butcher peoples pets for their pleasures. No different to me. Debarking? Phucken unreal!