Dr. Phil
Do you watch Dr. Phil?
Dr. Phil comes to me via FM, from a station in Albany, NY, I believe.
My concerns about the good doctor:
I guess my first concern is that I have not yet heard Dr. Phil say one positive or encouraging thing and sound genuine. Not one. It sounds to me (and to be fair I have probably only heard four or five hours of his show), as if Dr. Phil’s people go out and find guests convenient for him to talk down to and objectify.
Clearly, his producers have little trouble finding the right people in the right circumstances on which he can perform this little trick. But that proves very little, and it amounts to a pretty empty meal to serve up to the masses who tune in.
If you happen to catch the show, notice how he does it. You can almost hear music cue up, a tiny pause after the guest says something and then whack- the patronizing zinger. This gets applause from the audience, ego gratification for him, a cheap fix for the viewer… voila.
But that’s not hard to achieve when it’s your turf, your show, your context, your audience primed for your program, and your producers bringing in the guests who are in a vulnerable position from the start. It doesn’t impress me much when a man in this position speaks from ego and condescends to people. It’s a cheap trick. Any marginally competent human being could do it.
My question is, do people feel good about themselves and about this human condition after watching?
I have walked away several times now with more appreciation for the troubled guests than for the host. The forty-one year old marrying an eighteen year old girl. The addicted teenager. The friend of a deceased celebrity drug addict who didn’t step in soon enough to rescue her. They all sounded more genuine to me than the man up there grilling them.
In one case I saw Dr. Phil invite for an interview the producer of a show called “Bum Fights.” The producer of this show convinces homeless people to fight with each other: punch, break bottles over each other’s heads, etc. He films it, and makes money off of them. They showed an interview with the guy, who said something like “People look at bums and they see something disgusting, they see a derelict… I see talent.” Dr. Phil made a big show of how exploitive this was, how repugnant. Then, when the guy walked out onto the stage for the interview, Phil immediately and with dramatic flourish kicked him off. Didn’t even allow him to say a word. It was moral grandstanding of the most obvious kind. As a psychologist, Dr. Phil should be smart enough to know that he sees himself in this producer, and that his indignation is for his own gratification.
From what I have heard, our friend Phil usually finds an opportunity to deliver some sort of grandstanding platitude, the kind of cheap wisdom you find hanging in someone’s kitchen after they’ve been through AA. He leaves me with doubt, though, as to whether he has the insight, intuitive feel, or compassion needed to actually help these people or inspire them to make changes in their lives. I don’t know that he helps his audience either, or anyone else, except his network and investors. In short, I think he focuses on the negative, and the cheap gratification associated with it.
But, there is always hope. Who knows, maybe I will turn on the radio tomorrow while I’m out running errands and Dr. Phil will impress me with his acumen and his sincerity. This is my hope.
Dr. Phil, I’m going to do the thing for you that you fail to do for your guests: I want to believe in you; I believe you are a good man at heart. I am expecting your very best.
Show us that you can inspire and lead by example. Your guests are vulnerable; don’t go for the kill. Speak from your heart, from generosity and compassion.
Demonstrate your understanding of this unshakable truth:
You can try to motivate people by talking down to them, or you can try to motivate people by believing in them. You always get better results when you treat people as if you believe in them.
For the rest of us, my suggestion is that we shine the light of our attention on those who can imagine something better for this world, who see the beauty and potential in humanity, not look for the worst and exploit it for profit. You could do either with the same guests and the same audience. It all depends on your perspective and where your heart is.
I like Dr. Wayne Dyer. I find Dyer insightful, and his words resonate.
I feel Waynes work would be a great antidote to the toxic spectacle we dealt with above. You just might find yourself feeling hopeful afterwards.
Tristan L. Sullivan









21. May, 2007 at 00:38
I agree, Wayne Dyer is better by far. Good observations about Dr. Phil. ‘Helping’ people get better by insulting them isn’t helpful or useful. No one in their right mind would ever do what Dr. Phil does - that’s why he’s on TV, IMHO.
21. June, 2007 at 13:12
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! uhuhbeanjja
21. June, 2007 at 16:56
Thank you! Stay tuned for the world premier of my music video.
21. June, 2007 at 19:47
ha ha. ‘i believe in you, dr, phil. you CAN say something positive’…if i didn’t know you better, tristan, i’d call this a beautifully sarcastic witticism. but i know that you are mostly sincere. (85%, anyway
) “you don’t need IQ, you just need GUY-Q” -Dr. Phil. in other words, you’re smart in other ways, but when it comes to guys, you’re an idiot. so if i’m the girl hearing his advice, i miss anything he might say to be after this statement, because all i can hear over and over in my head is that when it comes to guys, i’m not very intelligent. now i’m internalizing that idea because i believe dr. phil wants to help me and is very smart indeed. here’s a tip: don’t assign credibility to any “doctor” who goes by his/her first name. (except for maybe chirorpractors, but that’s another topic)
thank you for this food for thought. i think oyu’ve made an important observation here.
21. June, 2007 at 20:34
I meant every word.